Hello from Michael Blakenham

Hello there, 

I'm Michael Blakenham and for those who don't know it, I'm a district councillor for Bramford and Blakenham, and together with Steve Wright in next door Somersham we represent the Suffolk Together party on the Mid Suffolk District Council. 

Steve sits on one of the two MDSC Planning Committees and the Licensing Committee and I'm on the Environment Policy Panel and the Scrutiny Committee, (which can call in any Council decisions that deserve a second look). 

We do our best to attend all Parish Council meetings in our wards so that we can fulfil our election pledge to ensure that local voices are heard at the District Council level. 

A big issue at the moment is the total reorganisation of local government in Suffolk, hoping to make it less expensive and more efficient.  With this in mind the government-appointed Boundary Committee made a preliminary recommendation that the Suffolk County Council, the seven District Councils and the Ipswich Borough Council should all be abolished and be replaced by two unitary authorities; one to represent Ipswich and Felixstowe and the parishes between (200,000 people) the other the rest of rural Suffolk (400,000 people). 

It also considered the possibility of a single unitary council.  Both these alternatives would involve massive disruption and job losses, which is not what is needed in these tough economic times and neither  has  received broad support in the County.   There will then be a further public consultation until mid-May, with a revised report going to Government in July and a final decision scheduled for September, 

The Suffolk Together party believes that although a single unitary for Suffolk would be the better of the two possibilities so far  put forward, it would be  far too remote from the parishes especially as it would involve interposing new unelected "community boards" to replace the elected district councils.  This also applies to the "two unitary" alternative which has the added disadvantage of separating Suffolk's main commercial and industrial growth areas from the rest of the rural community. 

The Suffolk Together view is for more government to be devolved as close to local people as possible. For that reason we would have preferred  to see Suffolk going for three or four unitary councils including one for Ipswich and the six existing district councils being combined in pairs or threes with the County Council being abolished.  Considerable economies would be achieved and the newly elected councils would connect much more closely with the local people and parishes.  None of the parishes in Steve or my ward want to end up as part of an enlarged Ipswich, so as more unitaries are not on offer we will be pushing for a single Suffolk and one that works as best it can,

What do you think?  Click here and give us your ideas.

Many other local Suffolk issues will be appearing on this blog in the coming weeks ---- lack of integrated planning is one (see Local Government button). After several months of pushing I've got  MSDC to agree to  talk to the County Council and the Highways Agency  about traffic infrastructure problems building up in the Great Blakenham area, so watch this space.  But the Unitary issue is probably the most time critical and I hope will help to get the ball rolling on the blog.........


Posted 03-27-2009 10:28 AM by Michael Blakenham

Comments

Godfrey Wrench wrote re: Hello from Michael Blakenham
on 04-03-2009 8:14 PM

What an interesting blog! It is good to see that action is being taken to co-ordinate investigations into our traffic concerns.

James Dean wrote re: Hello from Michael Blakenham
on 04-27-2009 3:10 PM

Michael,

many thanks for your very informative blog. You wil definitly have my suppoprt at the June elections .

Can you do more blogs like this please?

Godfrey Wrench wrote re: Hello from Michael Blakenham
on 04-30-2009 8:37 PM

Can you tell us how Mid Suffolk plan to handle the appeal by Snoasis to overturn the planning conditions?

Godfrey Wrench wrote re: Hello from Michael Blakenham
on 05-16-2009 10:21 AM

Michael, what are your views on the waste issue that has been posted on the waste blog?

The three actions points seem to make good sense to me!

What do you think about my ideas on Primary education I posted on the Education blog?

Michael Blakenham wrote re: Hello from Michael Blakenham
on 05-24-2009 4:27 PM

Hello GW, Of course reduction of suppliers' packaging has to be the first step, followed by customers  using fewer plastic bags.  Even if you have forgotten your reusable bags and are visiting a supermarket,  there's nothing to stop you putting everything straight into the trolley, unloading into the car and then transferring to your reuseable when you get home,                                               Second step, recycling, where we have an excellent record in Suffolk.                                      Third, anearobic digestion producing methane, another forn of energy from waste. What little remains goes to landfill.                                          What the County Council conveniently overlook is that incineration also produces toxic waste, approximately ten per cent of the total, which also has to go to landfill.

Godfrey Wrench wrote re: Hello from Michael Blakenham
on 05-24-2009 7:55 PM

Good to see a politician with a clear strategy!

Suffolk does have an excellent recycling record but seems to be unaware that incineration would discourage recycling and that the 60% recycling at present should be aimed at attaining 90%.

Michael Blakenham wrote re: Hello from Michael Blakenham
on 05-25-2009 7:34 PM

SCC  argue that it won't affect recycling rates. This is hard to believe for at least two reason.  First you need to balance the burn.  You can't burn just sludge. Secondly, the 30 year PFI contract will include minimum supplies of waste material garantees, with severe penalties if not reached,   This could mean that it was not in the county's interest for us to reach 90 per cent recycling efficency.  MichaelB

Godfrey Wrench wrote re: Hello from Michael Blakenham
on 06-01-2009 1:26 PM

I see Mr Field is challenging you over LGR on his website. He says LibDems voted for the parishes to not be joined to Ipswich. What he does not say is how this will work if LibDem policy is for a two unitary. Ipswich within the town boundary would be too small - which is why the initial LGR was rejected!

mary north wrote re: Hello from Michael Blakenham
on 06-03-2009 9:44 PM

Hope you do well tomorrow. We need someone with integrity to look after people's local concerns, and it sounds as if you are just the man

  Privacy Policy | Terms of Use Copyright © 2009 Suffolk Together

Published and promoted by Suffolk Together, Chairman & District Councillor : Michael Blakenham, Cottage Farm, Little Blakenham, Ipswich IP8 4LZ; District Councillor: Stephen Wright, Inghams Farm, Valley Road, Little Blakenham,Ipswich, IP84LR Vice Chairman Peter Welham, The Rooks, Old Paper Mill Lane, Claydon, Ipswich IP6 0AL

Views expressed on this website are those of individuals and not necessarily those of the Suffolk Together party.

Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems